Submission to the Department of Health and Children – Health Bill 2006
Introduction
The National Disability Authority (NDA) was established in June 2000 as an independent statutory body operating under the aegis of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. It has substantial statutory remits in the areas of policy, research and standards under the National Disability Act, 1999 and has been given a number of additional functions under the Disability Act 2005.
One of its chief functions, as outlined in the NDA Act (1999), is 'to support the achievement of good standards and quality in the provision of programmes and services provided or to be provided to people with disabilities' (Part II, sections 8 (2) c, d and f and 10 (1)).
Other statutory functions of the NDA, under the NDA Act 1999, of particular relevance in relation to the Health Bill 2006 are those of:
- Advising the Minister on issues of policy and practice relating to disability;
- Assisting in the co-ordination and development of policies in relation to persons with disabilities;
- Undertaking, commissioning or collaborating in research projects and activities on issues relating to disability including the development of information;
- acting as an advisory body with regard to the development of standards (Part II, section 8, 2, c)
- monitoring the implementation of standards and codes of practice (Part II, section 8, 2, d)
- preparing codes of practice (Part II, section 8, 2, f), and
- making recommendations to the Minister for the review, reduction or withdrawal of any moneys provided by the Oireachtas for any programme or service (Part II, section15, 1 and 4)
The National Disability Authority (NDA) welcomes the opportunity to make a submission on the Health Bill 2006 (the Bill). We also acknowledge and welcome the commitment made, in the Background Paper, to carry out a Regulatory Impact Analysis on the legislative proposals - and we look forward to working with the Department on this matter.
The NDA duly notes the role given to the Health Information Quality Authority (HIQA) in Section 10 of the Disability Act 2005. We also note the reference made, in Section 5 (5) of The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004, in relation to the development of standards for the independent assessment of need for health related services - and the probable role for HIQA in this function.
Sections 14 and 39 of the Disability Act and Section 6 of The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 also provide than an individual can make a complaint or appeal where the assessment was not conducted in a manner that conforms to those standards.
The core theme of the Health Service Reform Programme (2003) is the need to modernize health structures so that they can deal with the demands placed on the system now and over the coming decades. Central to this is the ability to deliver a high quality of service for people on a consistent, transparent and accountable, national basis.
The aim of the submission is to set out recommended changes to the Health Bill 2006 in relation to both specialist services for people with disabilities and more general health services accessed by people with disabilities.
Quality Framework (or overall approach)
One of the key aims of the Health Strategy - Quality and Fairness (2001) is to provide high quality health and personal social services. One of its main objectives is to create standardised quality systems to ensure the protection of the safety of users of services and improving the quality of services. Now, the Health Bill 2006 sets out the important remits of HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector of Social Services in relation to the assurance and promotion of quality and protection in health and personal social services.
The Health Bill 2006 needs to present a vision for a new national quality framework that is capable of delivering the highest possible levels of quality and safety of person centred service provision. It is generally acknowledged that: (a) the development and implementation of mandatory standards and regular inspection against these standards and (b) more general promotion of quality improvement and excellence, constitute two essential, complementary components of any such framework.
It is important to differentiate between (a) the assurance and protection of quality and safety of person centred service provision through the development, implementation and inspection of mandatory standards and (b) the promotion of excellence through the promulgation of voluntary standards. It is also important to acknowledge the need for both. This is clearly a key challenge which will need to be addressed in the current legislative reform.
The NDA concurs that the delivery of high quality, person-centred services can be ensured by requiring that: (a) health and personal social services comply with mandatory standards and (b) also engage in voluntary continuous quality improvement and accreditation programmes and activities aimed at promoting quality improvement and excellence. We would, therefore, recommend that HIQA adopt a twin track approach, based on both.
HIQA must firstly review and analyse the full range of services to identify the services that require mandatory standards. In addition, HIQA will need to identify which accreditation and continuous quality improvement programmes and initiatives satisfy the requirements of HIQA and can be selected for use in different health and personal social services.
HIQA needs to be aware that not all services may require mandatory standards and inspection. In making its deliberations HIQA needs to take into account factors such as the vulnerability of the users of the service:
- People with disabilities in residential care are acknowledged as particularly vulnerable and mandatory standards in this area are urgently required. The most recent figures from the National Intellectual Disability Database indicated that there are currently almost 8,000 people with an intellectual disability living in residential care and more than 600 people with physical or sensory disabilities (HRB, 2005 and 2004).
- In a review of literature on abuse of people with disabilities, which was commissioned by the NDA in 2005, the author (Brown, 2006) points out that there are areas of practice that appear to be particularly prone to slide into abuse unless there are careful controls, regulation and scrutiny. The study report describes the following examples of these areas of practice, such as challenging behaviour, personal and intimate care, control and restraint, sexual education and assistance and managing clients' financial affairs.
In a number of areas the groundwork for the development of mandatory standards has been completed:
- The Social Services Inspectorate already inspects residential centres for children, special care units and foster care, using national standards for residential centres (2001), special care units (2001) and foster care (2003) developed by the Department of Health and Children. Other inspection processes within the health and personal social services include the mental health service inspections under the Mental Health Act 2001, pre-school services inspections using the Child Care (Pre-school Services) Regulations, 1996 and the nursing homes inspections using the Nursing Home Act, 1990.
- New draft National Standards for Disability Services produced by the NDA and the Department of Health and Children have been forwarded by the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children to the interim HIQA, following a period of extensive national consultation. These National Standards for Disability Services are designed to apply to all statutory and non statutory agencies that provide disability services for children and adults with autism, intellectual, physical and/or sensory disability. They provide the foundation for mandatory standards to be set by HIQA and inspected by the Office of the Chief Inspector.
- Finally, the Department of Health and Children have recently established a Working Group to develop minimum standards for residential services for older persons.
Currently, a wide and extensive range of voluntary accreditation and continuous quality improvement programmes, schemes and activities are available to health and personal social service providers (see also Department of the Taoiseach, 2004, Report on Accreditation Schemes in the Civil Service). HIQA should review these programmes, schemes and activities and recognise those that meet the criteria set by HIQA. This will enable service providers to apply for the officially HIQA recognised accreditation programmes, schemes and activities.
Current examples include:
- The Irish Health Services Accreditation Board (IHSAB) has already developed a scheme for the accreditation of Acute Care services, as well as Palliative Care services.
- Other non-statutory organisations, such as the National Children's Nurseries Association, have developed Excellence Awards for providers who are committed to raising standards and providing quality services.
Health Information and Health Technology Assessment
The NDA is concerned that the functions for the HIQA in relation to health information and technology assessment as outlined in the Health Bill 2006 differ notably from the functions of HIQA as originally envisaged in the Department of Health and Children's Quality and Fairness Health Strategy (2001).
In particular, the original provisions for HIQA to develop and oversee health technology assessment and health information have not been adequately addressed in the Health Bill 2006. Carrying out evidence-based Health Technology Assessments is crucial in ensuring that the most appropriate and effective care and treatments are used. The current function of HIQA as outlined in the Health Bill 2006 does not sufficiently address this issue.
Similarly, the Quality and Fairness Health Strategy (2001) and the National Health Information Strategy (2004) outlined numerous functions for HIQA which are not reflected in the Health Bill 2006, including provisions for HIQA to:
- develop and agree guidelines governing access to information from health agencies,
- promote education, training and skills development for information staff,
- promote and coordinate national research and development of e-Health,
- develop and agree the overall Health Service Data Model and minimum datasets.
In relation to services for people with disabilities, the Department of Health and Children has recently conducted a Strategic Review of Disability Services. Under this review, the Department set up a specialist study group on Information and Databases to advise the Department on the strategic direction in this area. This Steering Group (2005) endorses the crucial role of HIQA in putting in place a framework for adopting and implementing data, technical and quality information standards and recommends that all future data gathering/survey instruments should be firmly grounded in the World Health Organisation's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The Steering Group also concluded that the information on the assessment of need and service statements under the Disability Act 2005 will require specific attention and aggregate data will need to be integrated with existing datasets.
The NDA recommends that the Bill be amended to include the proposed statutory functions for HIQA in relation to information and health technology as originally proposed in the Health Strategy - Quality and Fairness (2001) and the National Health Information Strategy (2004).
We would now like to make a number of specific comments in relation to the Health Bill 2006, as well as the Background Paper.
Background Paper
- Part 1 – Preliminary matters
- Part 2 – Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA)
- Part 3 - The Office of the Chief Inspector
The NDA is concerned about the statement from the Department of Health and Children that the standards set by HIQA would not be legally binding (page 2 of the Background Paper). This statement needs further explanation as this may lead to serious difficulties in relation to the implementation and inspection of services.
Part 1 - Preliminary matters
- In relation to Part 1 of the Health Bill 2006, the NDA would like to recommend that:
- Head 2, Interpretation - The definition of 'dependant person' needs to include people with mental health and intellectual impairment;
- Head 2, Interpretation - Sub-sections (a) and (b) under the definition of 'disability' should be removed, in order to align the definition of 'disability' used in the Bill with the definition used in the Disability Act, 2005.
- Head 2, Interpretation - It might be useful to include a classification and definition of what is meant by 'health and personal social services', including a break down of types of services as is included in the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act 2001.
- Head 3, Commencement - The NDA recommends the earliest possible commencement date for provisions in relation to standards for disability services and associated provisions pertaining to the Social Services Inspectorate. We are particularly concerned that standards in relation to independent needs assessment are required urgently to enable assessments to proceed. The Bill should address the requirements of the Disability Act 2005 in this regard.
Part 2 - Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA)
In this part of the submission, we will outline our main recommendations in relation to the functions of HIQA, as outlined in Head 9 of the Health Bill 2006.
Head 9, section (1) (a) - Standards setting
The NDA recommends that in working towards ensuring the highest possible levels of quality and safety in service provision for everyone in the State, all standards set by HIQA for mainstream health services, as well as disability specific services, take account of standards of service in respect of people with disabilities.
In relation to disability services, the NDA recommends that HIQA issue, as mandatory standards, the draft National Standards for Disability Services (2004), developed by the NDA and the Department of Health and Children, at the earliest possible date.
The NDA also recommends that specific reference is made to:
- Section 10 of the Disability Act 2005 and Section 5 (5) of The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 in regard to standards for needs assessment (assessment cannot commence in the absence of standards);
- Other potentially relevant legislation, for example: The Mental Health Act, 2001 (Part 3, Section 33 (1) and (2)).
It would be important, also, to have due regard to the role envisaged for HIQA in The Health Strategy - Quality and Fairness (2001) and the National Health Information Strategy (2004), in relation to information and health technology.
Finally, the Bill needs to specifically address the important potential role for HIQA in setting and monitoring standards for health services, products or systems provided or developed by private enterprise without exchequer funding.
Head 9, section (1) (b) - Monitoring the level of compliance with standards
It is important to clearly state (i) how the Minister and Executive are to be advised of levels of compliance with mandatory standards (mechanisms and required frequency of reporting) and (ii) what enforcement powers the Minister and HIQA will have to ensure that remedial action is taken in cases or areas of non compliance.
Action 111 of the National Health Strategy (2001) refers to the development of a reporting system on the national performance of services against specified national standards. The NDA recommends that the Health Bill 2006 should make explicit reference to this function.
It is essential that HIQA is given a strong statutory remit to require that all health and personal social service providers be required to comply with relevant mandatory standards, such as the draft National Standards for Disability Services. In addition, HIQA should identify which accreditation or quality improvement programmes and activities service providers may participate in on a voluntary basis.
(The Bill ought to make explicit reference to the complementary nature of the various roles and functions of the NDA, HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector and the need to adopt a collaborative and coordinated approach, in this regard. See page 12 of this Submission.)
In order to ensure that services comply with mandatory standards, HIQA should be given the remit to:
- Establish and maintain a register of approved services;
- Approve a service or refuse to approve a service, remove or add a service to the register of approved services;
- Attach different conditions to the registration of services;
- Publish the register of approved services;
- Collaborate with statutory bodies, such as the NDA, to identify and report on issues of key strategic importance.
It is vital that the Bill provide for a comprehensive system of regulations, setting out procedures/arrangements for registration, inspection, reporting, enforcement and sanctions - including the allocation of additional statutory enforcement powers for HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector.
Head 9, section (1) (c) - Investigate the safety, quality and standards
The NDA welcomes the investigative role proposed for HIQA. We would, however, recommend that the exact reporting mechanisms and (as indicated in the previous section) the enforcement powers of HIQA and the Minister, be further clarified.
- In regard to reporting, it is worth noting that the UK Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003, contains a detailed reporting process for the Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection.
- An effective system of enforcement and sanctions is vital. This would necessitate the allocation of additional statutory enforcement powers for the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) and the Office of the Chief Inspector, in particular in relation to the publication of findings and reports, the registration of services as approved services and financial penalties.
The NDA also recommends that the legislation should allow for HIQA initiating and launching an investigation of its own accord, e.g. in response to a serious complaint made either to HIQA or SSI, by service users or their personal advocates, regarding the standard of service they receive (cf. the investigative powers granted to other statutory bodies such as the Office of the Ombudsman and the Food Safety Authority of Ireland).
Head 9, section (1) (d) - Review resources to ensure best outcomes
The recent Comptroller and Auditor General's Value for Money Report on the provision of disability services by nonprofit organisations (March 2006) clearly indicates the need for ongoing review and control of resource allocation and deployment.
The report also highlighted the need for the implementation and monitoring of standards. The report (section 2.26) states that 'The changes taking place in the health sector generally and in the disabilities sector in particular, present challenges to the Department and the HSE to .... put into practice standards of care for persons with disabilities'.
Earlier statements regarding the NDA's concern at the apparent lack of formal reporting structures and enforcement powers in Head 9 refer. Again, the NDA also recommends that the legislation should allow for HIQA initiating and launching a review of its own accord.
Head 9, sections (1) (e) and (f) - Accreditation of services and the operation of schemes to ensure quality and safety
As outlined above, the Health Bill 2006 should promote the strategic vision of ensuring quality by implementing and inspecting mandatory standards and promoting excellence through voluntary processes, such as voluntary accreditation schemes.
The NDA recommends that the Regulatory Impact Analysis referred to in the Background Paper for this Bill, should contain a thorough review of the role, function and merits of the operation of a variety of schemes, programmes and inspection processes. At present there are many quality and regulatory bodies operating in Ireland. In this respect, the establishment of one central body, HIQA, is to be applauded. However, the impact of the continuation of existing schemes and programmes still needs to be evaluated.
See earlier notes on pages 4, 5 and 9 of this Submission.
Head 9, section (1) (g) - Evaluate and advise on clinical and cost-effectiveness of health technologies
The role of HIQA in relation to the development and promotion of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) as originally outlined in the National Health Strategy (2001) and the Health Service Reform Programme (2003) differs significantly from the function outlined under Head 9, section (1) (g). The NDA recommends that the Department amend this section of the Health Bill 2006 and strengthen the function of HIQA in this important area. The Bill should include a statement on the role of HIQA in overseeing the development of HTA and the promotion of its use.
Head 9, section (1) (h) - Evaluate information on health and personal social services
The NDA recommends that the Department ensures that this section on information is in line with the original action plans outlined in the National Health Strategy (2001) and the National Health Information Strategy (2004). The role and function of HIQA in the area of health information as currently envisaged in the Health Bill is inadequate and should be amended. The amendments should reflect the proposed role and functions of HIQA such as the development of health information, the approval of major health information developments and promoting the education, training and skills development for information staff.
In addition the HSE has important new functions vis a vis the identification and specification of needs, using the aggregate data from the needs assessments and service statements. HIQA must be cognisant of this new role of the HSE in its work on the development and promulgation of health information.
Head 9, (1) (h), Evaluate information available on health and personnel social services, should read: Evaluate information available on health and personal social services.
Head 9, section (1) (i) - Set and advise on compliance with health information standards
The NDA welcomes this section but we recommend that the Health Bill 2006 outline the actions that may be taken in relation to non compliance with the standards. We recommend that this section make provision for the assessment of information databases to ensure that the databases concerned are in compliance with standards, see also Action 4 in the National Health Information Strategy (2004).
Head 9, sections (2) and (3) - Remit of HIQA
As previously mentioned, the Health Bill needs to take into account the statutory functions of the NDA as outlined in the NDA Act 1999, in relation to programmes and services provided to people with disabilities - in particular, those of:
- acting as an advisory body with regard to the development of standards (s 8, c);
- facilitate and support the development and implementation of appropriate standards for programmes and services for persons with disabilities (s 8, e);
- preparing codes of practice (s 8, f), and, most especially,
- monitoring the implementation of standards and codes of practice (s 8, d) and
- making recommendations to the Minister for the review, reduction or withdrawal of any moneys provided by the Oireachtas for any programme or service (s 15, 1, 4).
Whereas the NDA does not have power to inspect, it can and does have right of access to information of relevance to its functions (Section 13 of the NDA Act, 1999 refers).
The NDA would recommend that the Bill (i) make explicit reference to the complementary nature of the various roles and functions of the NDA, HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector in relation to disability and (ii) clarify any apparent or likely overlap between the statutory remits of each. This would ensure both the avoidance of confusion and, or duplication of effort and the adoption of a coordinated approach to ensuring the delivery of high quality services.
The statutory role of the NDA should be explicitly mentioned and acknowledged under Head 9, section 2. The NDA strongly recommends that the National Disability Authority be listed as one of the public bodies (a) whose statutory functions HIQA shall not undertake to perform and (b) in consultation and collaboration with whom, HIQA should seek to perform both its unique and shared roles and functions.
The NDA should prove a valuable resource to HIQA in developing advice on issues of key value and strategic importance. NDA policy work is informed by an extensive programme of rigorous and robust research and complemented by the development of practical guidance and standards.
These considerations should be reflected elsewhere in the Bill, also, in particular in relation to:
- Membership of Board, Head 10 - We recommend that specific reference is made to the appointment of members with direct concern with or responsibility for activities relevant to the functions of HIQA, specifically in relation to disability interests and the interests of children and older people.
- Regulations relating to services, Head 56 - makes provision for the Minister for Health and Children to make regulations for registering residential centres for people with disabilities. We would recommend this provision should make explicit reference to doing so, in or following consultation with the NDA.
Part 3 - The Office of the Chief Inspector
The NDA welcomes the establishment of the Social Services Inspectorate on a statutory basis, in the form of the Office of the Chief Inspector of Social Services, as an Office within HIQA. There would, however, appear to be some degree of potential overlap in the respective roles and functions of HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector, envisaged under the new legislation. This needs to be clarified in order to avoid confusion.
The NDA recommends that a more formalised link between the Office of the Chief Inspector and HIQA should be established. Under the Mental Health Act 2001, the Inspector of Mental Health Services reports to the Commission on its findings. Furthermore, under the Mental Health Act 2001, the Mental Health Commission maintains the Register of Approved Centres. Similar provisions are currently not contained in the Health Bill 2006.
Head 41, (2) (a) - Monitor services
The NDA recommends that the roles and functions of HIQA and the Office of the Chief Inspector are further clarified in relation to their respective monitoring roles.
The Bill also needs to provide more clarity as regards the services covered under the inspection process. The NDA recommends that health and personal social service providers comply with relevant mandatory standards and that all such services are subject to inspection by the Office of the Chief Inspector.The Office of the Chief Inspector should be given additional functions in relation to the publication of the inspection reports.
Head 41, (2) (b) - Establishment and maintenance of a register of services
The NDA recommends that this function is given to HIQA to ensure a separation of inspectorial and approval functions. In other words, the Office of the Chief Inspector should make recommendations to HIQA in relation to the registration of services. In addition the Office of the Chief Inspector should be able to furnish a report in writing to HIQA in relation to the overall quality of care.
Head 41, (2) (c) - Inspection of registered services
The NDA recommends that a timeframe be included in this section (cf. the Mental Health Act 2001, section 51, which stipulates that each approved centre is inspected at least once a year.)
Head 41, (5) - Exemptions of designated services
The NDA recommends that the exclusion clauses contained under Head 41 are clarified further. For example section (5) (f) states that 'any service or premises which primarily provides or is primarily used for the provision of cultural, recreational, leisure or physical activities' is not included as designated centres. However the Bill does not provide a definition of 'cultural, recreational, leisure or physical activity' centre. A day activation unit for people with an intellectual disability might, for example, successfully argue that they are exempt of inspections.
The NDA strongly recommends that the exclusion clause for palliative care centres and centres for persons who are treated for acute illnesses is removed. People using these services belong to the most vulnerable groups in our society and need the assurance that the service they receive is regularly inspected.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
The Health Bill 2006 has the potential to become a so-called 'enabling' piece of regulation that creates the conditions whereby the overall economic and social welfare of society is maximised and the interests of the more vulnerable individuals are protected (Department of the Taoiseach, 2002). The NDA welcomes the Department's commitment to carry out a Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in order to analyse the potential impact.
Bearing in mind the recommendations of Dr Richard Boyle from the Institute of Public Administration (2005) that:
'In terms of the development of guidance on RIA, the analysis and international experience indicates that consultation is an important issue to be maintained in both the screening and the full RIA process, with a more thorough and formal consultation process expected as part of the full RIA. To be done well, the consultation process needs to give particular attention to the audience(s) to be involved, the objectives of the consultation and the methods used to consult',
the NDA looks forward to being included in the RIA process.
Recommendations
In summary, the NDA would like to make the following recommendations:
- The Health Bill 2006 needs to present a vision for a new national quality framework that is capable of delivering the highest possible levels of quality and safety of person centred service provision. This framework should consist of both: (a) the development and implementation of mandatory standards and regular inspection against these standards, including sanctions, and (b) more general promotion of quality improvement and excellence.
- The Bill must ensure that HIQA is given a strong remit to require that all health and personal social service providers be required to comply with relevant mandatory standards, e.g. the draft National Standards for Disability Services. HIQA should also be given a strong remit in relation to identifying which accreditation or quality improvement programmes and activities service providers may participate in on a voluntary basis. The Bill should make provision for an effective system of enforcement and sanctions. This should include the allocation of additional statutory enforcement powers for the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) and the Office of the Chief Inspector, in particular, in relation to the publication of findings and reports, the registration of services as approved services and financial penalties.
- The Bill should clarify any apparent or likely overlap between the statutory remits of HIQA, the Office of the Chief Inspector and NDA, under the new legislation. This would serve to avoid confusion and duplication of work and would facilitate a consultative, collaborative and coordinated approach to ensuring the efficient and expedient realization of the vision presented by the Bill for delivering high quality, safe person-centred services.
- The Health Strategy - Quality and Fairness (2001) and the National Health Information Strategy (2004) proposed statutory functions for HIQA in relation to information and health technology. It is particularly important that the functions set out for HIQA include: developing guidelines governing access to information from health agencies, promoting education, training and skills development for information staff, coordinating national research and development of eHealth and agreeing the overall Health Service Data Model, and minimum datasets. These proposed functions should be included in the Bill.
- The Bill should address the relevant sections of the Disability Act 2005 (Part 2, Assessment of Needs, Service Statements and Redress) in relation to the setting of standards for needs assessment. In addition the HSE has important new functions, the identification and specification of needs and HIQA must be cognisant of this new role in its own work around the development and promulgation of health information.
Appendix 1 - References
- Barron, S. & Mulvany, F., (2005), Annual Report of the National Intellectual Disability Database Committee 2004, Dublin: Health Research Board
- Brown, H. (2006, unpublished), Abuse of people with disabilities in Ireland: Mapping the knowledge base, Dublin: National Disability Authority
- Comptroller and Auditor General (2006), Report on Value for Money in the provision of Disability Services by Nonprofit Organisations, Dublin: Government Publications
- Department of Health and Children (2001), National Health Strategy: Quality and Fairness - A Health Strategy for You, Dublin: Government Publications
- Department of Health and Children (2004), National Health Information Strategy, Dublin: Government Publications
- Department of Health and Children, Specialist Study Group on Information and Databases (2005), Strategic Review of Disability Services - Information and Databases Specialist Study Group Report, Internal Publication Department of Health and Children
- Department of the Taoiseach (2002), Towards Better Regulation - Consultation Document, Dublin: Government Publications
- Department of the Taoiseach (2004), Report on Accreditation Systems in use in the Civil Service, available from: http://www.bettergov.ie
- Galligan, K. & Mulvany, F. (2004), National Physical and Sensory Disability Database: Preliminary Analysis, Dublin: Health Research Board
- Irish Health Services Accreditation Board (2004, 2nd Edition), Acute Care Accreditation Scheme, Standards and Guidelines, Dublin: IHSAB
- National Disability Authority (2003), Towards Best Practice in Provision of Health Services for People with Disabilities in Ireland, Dublin: National Disability Authority
- National Disability Authority and the Department of Health and Children (2004), Draft National Standards for Disability Services, Dublin: National Disability Authority
- Social Services Inspectorate (2001), National Standards for Children's Residential Centres, available from: http://www.issi.ie
- Social Services Inspectorate (2001), National Standards for Special Care Centres, available from: http://www.issi.ie
- Social Services Inspectorate (2003), National Standards for Foster Care Services, available from: http://www.issi.ie
